It builds the product and operating software around event forecasts or outcome contracts: participant interfaces, market creation, order execution or scoring, balances, resolution, reporting and administration. For a custom engagement, Capermint proposes an agreed specification, implementation, validation and handover. The operating model and permitted audience must be decided before money movement is included.

We can scope comparable functional patterns such as binary outcome contracts, an order book, wallet onboarding or an evidence-based resolution workflow. A similar interface or engine does not reproduce a platform’s authorization, liquidity, integrations or operating rights. Each reference is a design comparison; Capermint is not affiliated with either platform.

An order book matches compatible bids and offers and needs a credible plan for two-sided trading. An automated market maker quotes through a pricing rule and requires funded liquidity and exposure controls. The right choice depends on market activity, trade sizes, collateral, operator responsibilities and the proposed launch model. Compare both with worked examples before choosing.

Yes. A discovery brief can define a prediction app using non-redeemable points, forecasting scores, leagues and an administration console. Prizes, paid entry, redemption and virtual items with value change the analysis. Your advisers should review the actual mechanics and audience; the free-to-play label alone does not settle eligibility.

An existing licensed base can be evaluated against your engine, interface, integration and ownership requirements. The engagement can cover custom development or a defined extension of that base. Request a working demonstration, license terms, source access, upgrade policy, integration limits and references before committing to white-label prediction market software.

Cost follows the agreed scope: market formats, matching or pricing logic, web and mobile interfaces, ledger and custody design, outside integrations, audit requirements and expected load. A proposal should separate development, third-party fees, independent reviews and ongoing operations. A meaningful estimate requires these decisions rather than a generic platform price.

Timing depends on specification readiness, integration access, review requirements and the first-release boundary. Design and a simulation prototype can be separated from production engineering. A delivery plan should name dependencies, review checkpoints and acceptance criteria. Regulatory, provider and app-store approvals have separate timelines and cannot be guaranteed by a development schedule.

No. Product structure, contract types, location, user eligibility and operating activities affect the legal analysis. Qualified counsel should establish the applicable requirements and approvals for your business. Software controls, KYC integrations and geofencing can implement that approved policy; they do not grant authorization to operate.

The proposal must name these responsibilities. Liquidity may come from contracted market makers, funded pools or participant orders; software cannot guarantee it. Resolution needs a named evidence source, rulebook, review roles and dispute procedure. Outside oracle and data services should have documented responsibilities, costs and failure paths.

Ownership, pre-existing components and licensed dependencies must be written into the contract. Request repository access, build instructions, architecture documents, deployment configuration and an account inventory. Hosting, stores and provider accounts should be assigned to the agreed owner. Handover and access revocation should be explicit acceptance items.

A paid or otherwise agreed technical assessment can be scoped before takeover. It should inspect the repository, build reproducibility, architecture, licensing, balances, access controls and open defects. The assessment determines what can be retained, what needs replacement and which production risks must be closed before a relaunch.

Send your intended audience and jurisdictions, the money or points model, market formats, target interfaces, existing assets, desired first release and integration assumptions. Include the budget envelope, procurement process and target decision date. An early brief can leave questions open as long as responsibilities and assumptions are recorded.